Bible Contradictions: A Primer
by D. Adams March 23, 2007
by D. Adams March 23, 2007
Are There Bible Contradictions?
Most Christians are aware of the claims skeptics espouse
about apparent Bible contradictions. However, are these contradiction claims
valid? The first thing to recognize is that the Bible has 40 authors spanning
of a period of 1500 years. We need to realize that during this elapse of time
we often find different cultural settings. The Bible is a work of progressive
revelation, not an instant compilation. With 40 authors, the literary forms and
writing styles will vary. Within these two themes, it's important for the
reader to understand the need for a study in ANE (Ancient Near East) culture,
historical-grammatical method of interpretation, etymology (word study) and
literary forms just to name a few.
The critical error is made by the skeptic when s/he uses
only one verse, and then takes another verse elsewhere in the Bible to make the
contradiction seem valid. This would be the equivalent of taking an elliptical
(partial quote) statement and juxtapose (side by side comparison) it with
another elliptical statement either from the same author or another author
writing on a similar topic. The context is found within the chapter, not
necessarily the verse. Let’s look at a projected contradiction and work through
the passage systematically.
Acts 20:35 "In everything I did, I showed you that
by this kind of hard work we must help the weak, remembering the words the Lord
Jesus himself said: 'It is more blessed to give than to receive.'"
The skeptic makes claim that this quote from Jesus cannot be
found in the Bible. Although this verse is similar to Matt 10:8 “Service and
generosity should be abundant” no other verse can be found where Jesus made
this statement. First, we have to remember the culture. The culture at that
time was mostly composed of oral tradition, and floating traditions that are
called agrapha. The term “agraphon” is defined as a saying that was not written
down in the canonical gospels. This can be just one of the dangers with anyone
adhering to the “Solo Scriptura” approach to theology. Solo Scriptura means
scripture alone, without the need, or use of traditions. This is not to be
confused with Sola Scriptura—which allows tradition, and outside sources to
find truth about the scriptures or Christianity.
This is a fine example of the importance of the study of ANE
cultures. If you are a history buff, the Bible will keep you busy for a
life-time of diligent studies. For every question or objection raised by the
critics, or skeptics there is an answer to be found. I highly recommend
visiting the Tektonics website for all of your difficult verses, or Biblical
studies. You can find the website at: http://www.tektonics.org
Here is a list of importance when addressing scripture:
- Study
the chapter—not an isolated verse
- Study
the author and his use of literary forms
- Find
the meaning of the author—do not assume an interpretation
- Look
at the context of the chapter, who is this spoken to
- Study
the culture and time setting—make use of their surroundings
- Make
use of commentaries
- Use
Lexicons to decipher Greek and Hebrew terms (crosswalk.com)
- Find
parallel verses on the subject (Use of Concordances)
- The
Bible is translated from other languages
- Words
have more than one meaning—study the surrounding context
The list is not exhaustive but it will give you some of the
guidelines that need to be addressed before the contradiction can be made
valid. Just as a real estate agent will tell you the most important selling
point is location, location, location, the most important thing for us to
remember is context, context, and context. If you have not obtained the E-Sword
e-Bible I highly recommend downloading this program. It offers different
translations, lexicon, dictionary, commentaries, and study notes. You can find
this free program at: http://www.e-sword.net/
If you enjoy critical study of the texts I highly recommend
picking up a version of the NET Bible from bible.org. This Bible has 60,932
notes (textual critic, and study notes). I recommend this Bible translation for
anyone studying theology, or wanting a more critical approach to the
scriptures.
As Christians we approach the Bible for our source of
authority, while using a historical-grammatical methodology, or a systematic
theological process approach to scripture interpretations. We also should
utilize various sources of extra-Biblical writings from early Church fathers,
up to modern day theologians, Bible commentaries, lexicons, and authors for
inspiration or insight. The Church appellations, creeds, or denominational
beliefs are not always our source of authority--they merely summarize our
beliefs. Scripture should be the delimiting source in determining the
foundation and articulation of our beliefs.
In closing, the critic or skeptic may offer an apparent
contradiction—however the question arises, did they really find a
contradiction?